• Add to favourites
  • Write a letter
  • Subscribe
  • Post to the forum
Russian
news
Home  /  Ratings  /  Investment rating of Russian regions  /  2001-2002

Investment Attractiveness Rating of Russian Regions, 2001-2002

The seventh annual rating by Expert RA showed that the political longevity of governors is determined first and foremost by their success in promoting a good investment climate

This may sound strange, but governors are responsible for economic and investment growth in Russia. They are furthermore directly-not indirectly-responsible.

Usually no one mentions the legal aspect of this matter. Article 114 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, stating the functions of the federal government, mentions policy—budgetary, social, environmental, and even demographic policy—but says not a word about the economy or investment. The task of developing this policy is also not part of the president’s duties or those of the Federal Assembly. That is, unless the president, in accordance with the same Article 114, were to issue a decree forcing the government to develop and implement investment policy. However, there has been no sign of a decree like this. Thus, in general there are really no grounds to accuse federal authorities of pursuing exclusively fiscal goals. The Constitution does not charge regional authorities directly with taking care of the economy. However, Article 73 of the Constitution states that "within the confines of the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and the authority of the Russian Federation over objects under the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and Russian Federation subjects, the Russian Federation subjects shall enjoy the full extent of state power."

Moving on from these formal observations, the regional heads are perhaps the only link in the chain of authority determining the fate of the investment climate. At least, statistics from the last seven years of ratings testify convincingly to this fact.

Results of the Ratings
The investment climate in Russia today is governed by two interrelated trends: a growing differentiation between regions and the formation of an investment core.

Investment Climate Components
Regional authorities have yet to take full advantage of their simplest and most effective resource, the formation of a regulatory base that would benefit investors.

The Nationwide Investment Context

Information and Methods

Rating Tables:

Table 1. Basic Parameters of Investment Development in Russia
Table 2. Russian Regions Divided by Investment Climate Rating, 2001-2002
Table 3. Investment Potential of Russian Regions, 2001-2002
Table 4. Russia’s Most Dynamic Regions in Terms of Investment Potential
Table 5. Regions with the Least Total Investment Risk
Table 6. Investment Risk in Russian Regions, 2001-2002
Table 7. The Most Dynamic Regions in Terms of Change in Investment Risk
Table 8. Regions with Greatest Integral Investment Potential
Table 9. Regions with Different Investment Climates by Federal Administrative District, 2001-2002
Table 10. Long-Term Stable Trends in Investment Risk
Table 11. The Relationship between Investment Climate and Time in Office of Regional Leaders
Table 12. Likelihood of Re-Election for Current Executive Heads of Federation Subjects

Maps:

Map 1. Investment Climate in Russia’s Regions, 2001-2002
Map 2. Changes in Investment Potential and Risk between 1997/98 and 2001/02

Business info